Working to assess safety of AI; job loss not intense in India: IT Secy

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Working to assess safety of AI; job loss not intense in India: IT Secy" has 434 words across 15 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 4 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Working to assess safety of AI; job loss not intense in India: IT Secy" was covered 5 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 357 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24381766</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/working-to-assess-safety-of-17340218368251</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 5h ago

Working to assess safety of AI; job loss not intense in India: IT Secy - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The IT ministry is working on a mechanism to assess safety and trust elements in artificial intelligence (AI) solutions but does not want to start with a regulation as it may hurt innovation in the AI space, a top official said on Thursday.

Speaking at CII's Global Economic Policy Forum, Ministry of Electronics and IT Secretary S Krishnan said the government has broadly addressed key regulations barring a couple of the issues like copyright and existential crisis.

He said under the IndiaAI mission, the government has tried to make a subtle distinction between responsible AI as defined by the West -- which is not expected to be regulated by the government -- and safe and trusted AI.