Will lay down law on HCs revoking orders dictated in open courts: SC

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Will lay down law on HCs revoking orders dictated in open courts: SC" has 402 words across 15 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 4 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Will lay down law on HCs revoking orders dictated in open courts: SC" was covered 9 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 305 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22878585</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/will-lay-down-law-on-17280352524064</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 9h ago

Will lay down law on HCs revoking orders dictated in open courts: SC - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The Supreme Court on Friday said it will lay down the law on the issue of high courts revoking orders dictated in open courts after the top court came across a case in which the Madras HC quashed a money laundering case against a former IPS officer and later modified its direction and reheard the matter.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih stayed the proceedings in a money laundering case against former IPS officer M S Jaffer Sait registered in connection with an alleged illegal allotment of a Tamil Nadu Housing Board plot.

The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Sait, who contended that his case was reheard within days after allowing his plea for quashing of the proceedings in the matter.