Why being climate ‘positive’ is the buzzy new goal of green building

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Why being climate ‘positive’ is the buzzy new goal of green building" has 2257 words across 70 sentences, which will take approximately 10 - 19 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Why being climate ‘positive’ is the buzzy new goal of green building" was covered 8 hours ago by Economic Times, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Economic Times' news outlet?

Economic Times is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1961 that covers mostly business news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 8 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 1 days ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23714217</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/why-being-climate-positive-is-17320818246292</li></ul>

Economic Times Logo Economic Times 8h ago

Why being climate ‘positive’ is the buzzy new goal of green building - Economic Times

Quick Summary:

These structures, often featuring distinctive tilted roofs for solar energy capture, aim to offset the substantial carbon emissions associated with construction.

These structures, often featuring distinctive tilted roofs for solar energy capture, aim to offset the substantial carbon emissions associated with construction.iStockBuildings — the creation, running and dismantling of them — make up some 40% of the world’s carbon emissions.

These take into account carbon absorbed by timber and straw in the building during its former life as trees and crops (a controversial calculus, because cutting a tree down now means it stops absorbing carbon at a crucial juncture of the climate crisis, as well as uncertainty about what happens to that stored carbon at the end of the building’s life).