What SCOTUS just did to net neutrality, the right to repair, the environment, and more

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "What SCOTUS just did to net neutrality, the right to repair, the environment, and more" has 3927 words across 110 sentences, which will take approximately 17 - 33 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "What SCOTUS just did to net neutrality, the right to repair, the environment, and more" was covered 5 days ago by The Verge, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Verge' news outlet?

The Verge is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2011 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 39 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #21417456</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/what-scotus-just-did-to-17196822769536</li></ul>

The Verge 5d ago

What SCOTUS just did to net neutrality, the right to repair, the environment, and more - The Verge

Quick Summary:

That interpretation could come under threat, even as the FCC just recently voted to reinstate net neutrality after it was repealed during the Trump administration.“Overruling Chevron has the potential to change the tenor of the impending judicial challenge to the new net neutrality rules dramatically,” University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School professor Christopher Yoo wrote in an article published prior to the Supreme Court ruling.

Brand X Internet Services that Chevron deference should be applied to the FCC’s interpretation of the Communications Act.“Brand X’s conclusion that the statute at issue is ambiguous made it highly likely that reviewing courts applying Chevron would uphold the net neutrality rules under review regardless of whether they were regulatory or deregulatory,” Yoo wrote.

But even with the EPA’s preemptively defensive crouch, its power plant rule “is incredibly legally vulnerable” to a rollback of Chevron deference, former Trump administration EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler said in a May episode of the Politico Energy podcast.“The overall pattern here is clear — it’s not just in this decision — the court majority is on a rampage designed to make it harder for the government to protect us,” Doniger said.