Vibe Coding: How Devs and Laymen Alike Are Using AI to Create Apps and Games

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Vibe Coding: How Devs and Laymen Alike Are Using AI to Create Apps and Games" has 1708 words across 71 sentences, which will take approximately 8 - 15 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Vibe Coding: How Devs and Laymen Alike Are Using AI to Create Apps and Games" was covered 2 days ago by Decrypt, a news publisher based in Estonia.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Decrypt' news outlet?

Decrypt is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2018 that covers mostly crypto news. The outlet is headquartered in Estonia and publishes an average of 4 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 14 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27254243</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/vibe-coding-how-devs-and-17427398258991</li></ul>

Decrypt 2d ago

Vibe Coding: How Devs and Laymen Alike Are Using AI to Create Apps and Games - Decrypt

Quick Summary:

Silicon Valley's newest buzzword is spreading through developer communities like wildfire, with some hailing vibe coding as a revolution—and others warning of digital catastrophe.

If developers increasingly rely on AI for even moderate coding tasks, then their foundational skills might deteriorate over time."Ease of use is a double-edged sword," AI researcher Harry Law told Business Insider."Beginners can make fast progress, but it might prevent them from learning about system architecture or performance.

Code written by AI is almost always flat-out wrong," said Reddit user Dw444 in a recent post."My employer pays for AI assistants we can use for work, and even the most advanced models are prone to start writing blatantly incorrect code at the drop of a dime.