US-based expert refutes foreign interference allegations in B'desh protests

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "US-based expert refutes foreign interference allegations in B&#039;desh protests" has 1039 words across 33 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "US-based expert refutes foreign interference allegations in B&#039;desh protests" was covered 10 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 97 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 17 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22009743</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/us-based-expert-refutes-foreign-17233399525892</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 10h ago

US-based expert refutes foreign interference allegations in B'desh protests - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

He said that the political instability in Bangladesh is a troubling situation, adding that it is going to be a very difficult task to bring into effect a peaceful political transition.

Krishnamoorthi requested Blinken to engage with Muhammad Yunus, the head of Bangladesh's interim government on August 8, and bring violence to an end and perpetrators to justice.

He also refuted allegations of foreign interference behind the mass uprising that led to Sheikh Hasina's ouster, stating he had not seen any "plausible evidence" to support these claims.