TikTok's survival at stake in all-out fight against potential US ban

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "TikTok&#039;s survival at stake in all-out fight against potential US ban" has 1626 words across 55 sentences, which will take approximately 7 - 14 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "TikTok&#039;s survival at stake in all-out fight against potential US ban" was covered 12 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 130 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #21788294</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/tiktoks-survival-at-stake-in-17220502509182</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 12h ago

TikTok's survival at stake in all-out fight against potential US ban - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

TikTok shelled out millions in the months before the law was signed, and its lobbyists have continued to blanket Capitol Hill as the court case plays out.

That argument echoes Trump’s own turnabout on TikTok — and his criticism of Meta Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg over Facebook’s decision to boot Trump from the platform after the deadly Jan.6, 2021, US Capitol riot.

The company’s representatives have lambasted lawmakers for passing an unconstitutional bill and argued that a TikTok ban will only benefit Meta, said two congressional staffers who requested anonymity to divulge private conversations.