TikTok fights US govt in federal court; argues ban violates First Amendment

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "TikTok fights US govt in federal court; argues ban violates First Amendment" has 1184 words across 34 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 10 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "TikTok fights US govt in federal court; argues ban violates First Amendment" was covered 17 hours ago by Business Mirror, a news publisher based in Philippines.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Mirror' news outlet?

Business Mirror is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly business and startups news. The outlet is headquartered in Philippines and publishes an average of 58 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 13 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Positive, indicating that people regard this as "good news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22568071</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/tiktok-fights-us-govt-in-17265831518327</li></ul>

Business Mirror Logo Business Mirror 17h ago

TikTok fights US govt in federal court; argues ban violates First Amendment - Business Mirror

Quick Summary:

TikTok faced off with the US government in federal court on Monday, arguing a law that could ban the platform in a few short months is unconstitutional while the Justice Department said it is needed to eliminate a national security risk posed by the popular social media company.

Judge Neomi Rao, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, said the creators suing over the law could continue speaking on TikTok if the company is sold or if they choose to post content on other platforms.

Daniel Tenny, an attorney for the Justice Department, acknowledged in court that data collection is useful for many companies for commercial purposes, such as target advertisements or tailoring videos to users’ interests.“The problem is that same data is extremely valuable to a foreign adversary trying to compromise the security of the United States,” he said.