The Head of NASA Is Being Awfully Catty About China's Amazing New Moon Samples

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "The Head of NASA Is Being Awfully Catty About China&#039;s Amazing New Moon Samples" has 596 words across 18 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "The Head of NASA Is Being Awfully Catty About China&#039;s Amazing New Moon Samples" was covered 3 days ago by Futurism, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Futurism' news outlet?

Futurism is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1997 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 0 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 5 days ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #21483668</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/the-head-of-nasa-is-17201160427314</li></ul>

Futurism 3d ago

The Head of NASA Is Being Awfully Catty About China's Amazing New Moon Samples - Futurism

Quick Summary:

China recently became the first country to ever return samples taken from the far side of the Moon, a historic mission that could have profound implications on our understanding of its evolution and ability to host human life.

NASA, however, is already eying returning astronauts to the surface as part of its 2026 Artemis III mission, something that is "magnitudes more difficult than a robotic landing," as Nelson told CNN.

"We are going through the process right now with our scientists and our lawyers to make sure that the instructions and guardrails that the Chinese are insisting on...are not a violation of the law, the Wolf Amendment," Nelson told CNN.