Supreme Court moved by prolonged legal battle of woman against divorce

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Supreme Court moved by prolonged legal battle of woman against divorce" has 754 words across 21 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Supreme Court moved by prolonged legal battle of woman against divorce" was covered 9 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 340 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22346532</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/supreme-court-moved-by-prolonged-17253632472962</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 9h ago

Supreme Court moved by prolonged legal battle of woman against divorce - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The trials and tribulations of a woman fighting a protracted legal battle against a family court granting the decree of divorce to her estranged husband multiple times has moved the Supreme Court to the extent that it said the judicial system was "grossly injudicious" to her.

He filed for divorce in a family court in Karnataka which not once but thrice granted the decree of divorce in favour of her husband disregarding the fact that he was not paying anything either to her or their minor child for maintenance.

The family court was asked multiple times by the high court, which the woman approached against the grant of divorce, to decide afresh the petition of her husband.