State cannot seize every private property for 'common good', says SC

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "State cannot seize every private property for &#039;common good&#039;, says SC" has 875 words across 44 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 8 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "State cannot seize every private property for &#039;common good&#039;, says SC" was covered 2 weeks ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 301 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23430018</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/state-cannot-seize-every-private-17308086229589</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 2w ago

State cannot seize every private property for 'common good', says SC - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Hrishikesh Roy, JB Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Rajesh Bindal, Satish Chandra Sharma, and Augustine George Masih gave the majority opinion, while Justice BV Nagarathna partially concurred, and Justice Dhulia dissented.

The court had earlier remarked that holding every private resource of an individual as part of the material resources of the community would be far-fetched and could deter investors who may question the level of protection they would receive.

Taking exception to this, Justice Nagarathna said, "Regardless, on a conspectus understanding of all contributing factors, such as the discussions in the Constituent Assembly and the tide of the times that found in the broad house of economic democracy a legitimate state policy, can we castigate former judges and allege them with ‘disservice’ only for reaching a particular interpretive outcome?