Silk Road Creator Ross Ulbricht Is Waiting for Trump to Keep His Word—and Set Him Free

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Silk Road Creator Ross Ulbricht Is Waiting for Trump to Keep His Word—and Set Him Free" has 2449 words across 85 sentences, which will take approximately 11 - 21 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Silk Road Creator Ross Ulbricht Is Waiting for Trump to Keep His Word—and Set Him Free" was covered 11 hours ago by Wired, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Wired' news outlet?

Wired is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1993 that covers mostly technology and economy news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 21 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23591897</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/silk-road-creator-ross-ulbricht-17316154166657</li></ul>

Wired 11h ago

Silk Road Creator Ross Ulbricht Is Waiting for Trump to Keep His Word—and Set Him Free - Wired

Quick Summary:

On the campaign trail, incoming US president Donald Trump promised to release Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht from prison if reelected.Will he keep his word?

After the government identified Ulbricht the administrator behind Silk Road’s cryptoanarchic marketplace and arrested him in an FBI sting in late 2013, Ulbricht was convicted in 2015 on seven charges relating to money laundering, computer hacki and the distribution of narcotics and sentenced to life in prison without the chance of parole.

While Ulbricht’s harsh sentence might be valid in a strictly technical sense, says Leeza Garber, a lecturer in law at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, in knotty cases like this, legal questions cannot be neatly isolated from ethical and political ones.“Just because something is reasonable, that doesn’t mean that it’s right,” says Garber.“We have such complex and conflicting views on the war on drugs and use of prison in this country.