SC issues contempt notice to Punjab for not implementing pension scheme

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "SC issues contempt notice to Punjab for not implementing pension scheme" has 764 words across 21 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "SC issues contempt notice to Punjab for not implementing pension scheme" was covered 1 days ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 311 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26677661</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/sc-issues-contempt-notice-to-17411703144894</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 1d ago

SC issues contempt notice to Punjab for not implementing pension scheme - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Therefore, we issue showcause notice to K A P Sinha, chief secretary, State of Punjab calling upon him to showcause why action under the Contempt Of Courts Act 1971 (both civil and criminal) should not be initiated against him," the court said.

Observing the court couldn't be taken for a ride, a bench of Justices Abhay Oka and N Kotiswar Singh asked the chief secretary to answer why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him for the violation of the undertakings.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a contempt notice to the Punjab chief secretary for failing to implement a three-decade-old pensionary benefits scheme in the state.