Samsung accuses India antitrust body of detaining employees, seizing data unlawfully

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Samsung accuses India antitrust body of detaining employees, seizing data unlawfully" has 566 words across 19 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Samsung accuses India antitrust body of detaining employees, seizing data unlawfully" was covered 2 hours ago by Channel News Asia, a news publisher based in Singapore.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Channel News Asia' news outlet?

Channel News Asia is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1999 that covers mostly economy and business news. The outlet is headquartered in Singapore and publishes an average of 50 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 1 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24373582</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/samsung-accuses-india-antitrust-body-1733998252520</li></ul>

Channel News Asia Logo Channel News Asia 2h ago

Samsung accuses India antitrust body of detaining employees, seizing data unlawfully - Channel News Asia

Quick Summary:

NEW DELHI : Samsung has accused India's competition watchdog of unlawfully detaining its employees and seizing data in a raid carried out in connection with an antitrust investigation on Amazon and Walmart's Flipkart, a legal filing shows.

The logo of Samsung Electronics is seen at its booth during The 26th Semiconductor Exhibition 2024 in Seoul, South Korea, October 23, 2024.

Samsung has obtained an injunction from the High Court that has put on hold the CCI proceedings, but the court has not yet ruled on its requests to return the data seized and to not allow the commission to rely on it.