Reopening Nord Stream 2 would be a catastrophic mistake

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Reopening Nord Stream 2 would be a catastrophic mistake" has 802 words across 35 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Reopening Nord Stream 2 would be a catastrophic mistake" was covered 22 hours ago by Financial Times, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Financial Times' news outlet?

Financial Times is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1888 that covers mostly markets, finance, and investing news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 6 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27194495</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/reopening-nord-stream-2-would-17424869071948</li></ul>

Financial Times 22h ago

Reopening Nord Stream 2 would be a catastrophic mistake - Financial Times

Quick Summary:

For the next German government to acquiesce in a reopening of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline under US ownership would be nothing short of catastrophic.

Recent reports of US-led efforts to reopen the last undamaged Nord Stream 2 pipeline and possibly repair another are therefore somewhat startling, to say the least.

It went viral in September 2022, about six months after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and for Germans, it remains a visceral, shudder-inducing reminder of their country’s worst energy crisis since the second world war.