Prosecutors say lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs want to ‘hijack’ criminal case to fight civil claims

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Prosecutors say lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs want to ‘hijack’ criminal case to fight civil claims" has 515 words across 19 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Prosecutors say lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs want to ‘hijack’ criminal case to fight civil claims" was covered 2 weeks ago by Business Mirror, a news publisher based in Philippines.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Mirror' news outlet?

Business Mirror is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly business and startups news. The outlet is headquartered in Philippines and publishes an average of 44 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 9 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23391563</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/prosecutors-say-lawyers-for-sean-17307092608229</li></ul>

Business Mirror Logo Business Mirror 2w ago

Prosecutors say lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs want to ‘hijack’ criminal case to fight civil claims - Business Mirror

Quick Summary:

NEW YORK—Federal prosecutors say lawyers for Sean Diddy’ Combs are trying to "hijack” the music mogul’s criminal case from them by asking a judge to force early disclosure of evidence, including his accusers’ identities.

In one instance, a judge on Wednesday ruled that a Tennessee woman who alleges Combs raped her in 2004 when she was 19 must proceed without anonymity or not at all.

Part of the grounds on which a judge rejected a bail package suggested by his lawyers was that he was a danger to obstruct justice and engage in witness tampering.