Promotion effective only after assuming duty, not from date of vacancy: SC

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Promotion effective only after assuming duty, not from date of vacancy: SC" has 508 words across 14 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Promotion effective only after assuming duty, not from date of vacancy: SC" was covered 5 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 293 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23906376</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/promotion-effective-only-after-assuming-1732716517</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 5h ago

Promotion effective only after assuming duty, not from date of vacancy: SC - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta said it was a well-settled principle that promotion became effective from the date it was granted and not the date of the vacancy or creation of the post.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday underlined that promotion only becomes effective upon assumption of duties and not from the date of the vacancy or recommendation.

"While the courts have recognised the right to be considered for promotion as not only a statutory right but also a fundamental right, there is no fundamental right to promotion itself," the bench said.