Privilege notice against BJP's Patra submitted for 'traitor' barb at Rahul

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Privilege notice against BJP&#039;s Patra submitted for &#039;traitor&#039; barb at Rahul" has 499 words across 10 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Privilege notice against BJP&#039;s Patra submitted for &#039;traitor&#039; barb at Rahul" was covered 2 weeks ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 276 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24161931</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/privilege-notice-against-bjps-patra-17334645137935</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 2w ago

Privilege notice against BJP's Patra submitted for 'traitor' barb at Rahul - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Congress MP Hibi Eden has submitted a notice to move a privilege motion against BJP MP Sambit Patra for his remarks calling Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi "traitor of the highest order", asserting that the usage of "completely defamatory and unparliamentary words" has clearly violated constitutional norms.

In a press conference held on December 5, Patra has referred to the Leader of Opposition as "traitor of the highest order" while making unfounded allegations against the LoP, he said.

"The usage of such words against the LOP, while being defamatory and unacceptable in public life, is also a complete breach of parliamentary privilege of the LoP," Eden argued.