Paul McCartney warns AI ‘could take over’ as UK debates copyright laws

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Paul McCartney warns AI ‘could take over’ as UK debates copyright laws" has 1331 words across 27 sentences, which will take approximately 6 - 12 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Paul McCartney warns AI ‘could take over’ as UK debates copyright laws" was covered 5 days ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 0 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 1 days ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24410173</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/paul-mccartney-warns-ai-could-17342311954881</li></ul>

The Guardian 5d ago

Paul McCartney warns AI ‘could take over’ as UK debates copyright laws - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

Former Beatle speaks out amid fears the rise of AI threatens income streams for music, news and book publishersPaul McCartney has backed calls for laws to stop mass copyright theft by companies building generative artificial intelligence, warning AI "could just take over”.

The former Beatle said it would be "a very sad thing indeed” if young composers and writers could not protect their intellectual property from the rise of algorithmic models, which so far have learned by digesting mountains of copyrighted material.Continue reading...

Next week the UK parliament will debate amendments to the data bill that could allow creators to decide whether or not their copyrighted work can be used to train generative AI models.