No arbitrary addition, deletion in voters list in Maha: EC to Congress

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "No arbitrary addition, deletion in voters list in Maha: EC to Congress" has 242 words across 9 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 3 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "No arbitrary addition, deletion in voters list in Maha: EC to Congress" was covered 1 days ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 181 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24639068</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/no-arbitrary-addition-deletion-in-17350509357189</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 1d ago

No arbitrary addition, deletion in voters list in Maha: EC to Congress - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The EC asserted that it is impossible to change actual voter turnout as statutory Form 17C giving details of voter turnout is available with authorised agents of candidates at the time of close of poll at the polling station itself.

It also explained how increase in voter turnout from 5 PM to 11:45 PM was normal, being part of the process of aggregation of voter turnout and how there can be bona fide but inconsequential differences in votes polled and votes counted.

In its response to the Congress, the poll authority said it would not be correct to compare 5 PM voter turnout data with final polling data.