More Spyware, Fewer Rules: What Trump’s Return Means for US Cybersecurity

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "More Spyware, Fewer Rules: What Trump’s Return Means for US Cybersecurity" has 2055 words across 72 sentences, which will take approximately 9 - 18 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "More Spyware, Fewer Rules: What Trump’s Return Means for US Cybersecurity" was covered 1 weeks ago by Wired, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Wired' news outlet?

Wired is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1993 that covers mostly technology and economy news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 16 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23584108</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/more-spyware-fewer-rules-what-17315824287969</li></ul>

Wired 1w ago

More Spyware, Fewer Rules: What Trump’s Return Means for US Cybersecurity - Wired

Quick Summary:

Experts expect Donald Trump’s next administration to relax cybersecurity rules on businesses, abandon concerns around human rights, and take an aggressive stance against the cyber armies of US adversaries.

Montgomery agrees that Trump may “adopt a more aggressive approach” to national cyber defense, including giving the National Guard “a more significant role” in protecting domestic infrastructure.

John Miller, senior vice president of policy at the Information Technology Industry Council, a major tech trade group, says it’s also possible that Trump officials “might not wait for the courts” to void those rules.