Minister's post does not entitle someone to special bail consideration: SC

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Minister&#039;s post does not entitle someone to special bail consideration: SC" has 806 words across 17 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Minister&#039;s post does not entitle someone to special bail consideration: SC" was covered 5 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 311 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #24401430</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/ministers-post-does-not-entitle-17341054369666</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 5h ago

Minister's post does not entitle someone to special bail consideration: SC - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, which granted conditional future bail to former West Bengal minister Partha Chatterjee in a money-laundering case related to the alleged cash-for-jobs scam in the state, said impartiality is a prerequisite to the rule of law, wherein decisions are based on the factual matrix of a case as opposed to an individual's position or influence.

Holding a minister's post does not entitle a person for a special consideration for the grant of bail, the Supreme Court said on Friday, asserting that "official positions, regardless of their stature, lose relevance for the purpose of exercising judicial discretion judiciously".

It rejected Chatterjee's argument seeking special consideration for the grant of bail on the ground that he was entitled for the relief as he was a minister at the relevant time.