Meta's Fact-Checking Partners Say They Were 'Blindsided' by Decision to Axe Them

Quick Summary:

Fact-checkers claim they had no idea the company was going to end their partnerships and are scrambling to figure out the financial implications of the move.

One editor at a US-based fact-checking organization that works with Metas, who was not authoritized to speak on the record, told WIRED that Meta’s decision “is going to eventually drain us out.

According to Duke, it is disappointing to hear Mark Zuckerberg accuse the organizations in Meta's US third-party fact-checking program of being “too politically biased”.“Let me fact check that.

---

More Pictures

---

Read Quick SummarySave Time

or

Article Details

Author / Journalist: David Gilbert

Category: BusinessTechnology

Markets: United StatesIreland

Topics: Business / Social Media Business

Source Website Secure: Yes (HTTPS)

News Sentiment: Neutral

Fact Checked: Legitimate

Article Type: News Report

Published On: 2025-01-07 @ 18:20:32 (1 days ago)

News Timezone: GMT +8:00

News Source URL: wired.com

Language: English

Article Length: 1398 words

Reading Time: 8 minutes read

Sentences: 51 lines

Sentence Length: 28 words per sentence (average)

Platforms: Desktop Web, Mobile Web, iOS App, Android App

Copyright Owner: © Wired

News ID: 24963681

View Article Analysis

About Wired

Main Topics: BusinessTechnology

Official Website: wired.com

Update Frequency: 1 posts per day

Year Established: 1993

Headquarters: United States

News Last Updated: 21 hours ago

Coverage Areas: United States

Ownership: Independent Company

Publication Timezone: GMT +8:00

Content Availability: Worldwide

News Language: English

RSS Feed: Available (XML)

API Access: Available (JSON, REST)

Website Security: Secure (HTTPS)

Publisher ID: #109

Publisher Details

Frequently Asked Questions