Meta AI Models 'Clearly Behind' DeepSeek, Says Analysts After Mark Zuckerberg Admitted DeepSeek Did Some Novel Things 'We're Still Digesting'

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Meta AI Models &#039;Clearly Behind&#039; DeepSeek, Says Analysts After Mark Zuckerberg Admitted DeepSeek Did Some Novel Things &#039;We&#039;re Still Digesting&#039;" has 496 words across 17 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Meta AI Models &#039;Clearly Behind&#039; DeepSeek, Says Analysts After Mark Zuckerberg Admitted DeepSeek Did Some Novel Things &#039;We&#039;re Still Digesting&#039;" was covered 14 hours ago by Benzinga, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Benzinga' news outlet?

Benzinga is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2010 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 30 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 9 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Positive, indicating that people regard this as "good news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #25908868</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/meta-ai-models-clearly-behind-17387593648647</li></ul>

Benzinga Logo Benzinga 14h ago

Meta AI Models 'Clearly Behind' DeepSeek, Says Analysts After Mark Zuckerberg Admitted DeepSeek Did Some Novel Things 'We're Still Digesting' - Benzinga

Quick Summary:

Analyst Takeaways: The note, based on insights from a data center engineering expert, suggests that while DeepSeek is ahead of Meta’s latest Llama model, it still lags behind leading AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic by about six months.“In terms of the tricks and methodology applied by DeepSeek, the leading labs such as OpenAI and Anthropic are fully aware of such methodologies and also employ these but such is not the case of Meta which is clearly behind,” the note added.

The expert also downplayed the significance of DeepSeek’s reported $5.6 million training run for its R1 model, noting that a comparable run at OpenAI would likely cost around $10 million, making DeepSeek’s “cost not so impressive relative to the U.S.” The note also suggested that OpenAI’s runs are likely more “comprehensive” and “secure”.

This comes as its CEO Mark Zuckerberg during Meta’s fourth-quarter earnings call stated that they are “still digesting” some of the “novel things” Chinese AI startup DeepSeek has done.