Lokpal seeks SEBI chief's 'explanation' on complaints against her

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Lokpal seeks SEBI chief&#039;s &#039;explanation&#039; on complaints against her" has 663 words across 21 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 6 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Lokpal seeks SEBI chief&#039;s &#039;explanation&#039; on complaints against her" was covered 2 weeks ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 163 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23469868</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/lokpal-seeks-sebi-chiefs-explanation-1731067094681</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 2w ago

Lokpal seeks SEBI chief's 'explanation' on complaints against her - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Anti-corruption ombudsman Lokpal on Friday sought SEBI chief Madhabi Puri Buch's "explanation" on complaints of impropriety and conflict of interest filed by a Lok Sabha member and two others on the basis of a report by US-based short-seller Hindenburg Research, according to an official order.

Buch, the chairperson of capital markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has been asked to submit her response within four weeks, according to the order."...

The Lokpal, however, clarified its order is only a "procedural directive" and "not an expression of our opinion on any matter in issue, either way".