Jim Zemlin on taking a ‘portfolio approach’ to Linux Foundation projects

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Jim Zemlin on taking a ‘portfolio approach’ to Linux Foundation projects" has 1964 words across 48 sentences, which will take approximately 9 - 17 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Jim Zemlin on taking a ‘portfolio approach’ to Linux Foundation projects" was covered 1 days ago by TechCrunch, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'TechCrunch' news outlet?

TechCrunch is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 17 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 13 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #27841324</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/jim-zemlin-on-taking-a-17445533607947</li></ul>

TechCrunch 1d ago

Jim Zemlin on taking a ‘portfolio approach’ to Linux Foundation projects - TechCrunch

Quick Summary:

The Linux Foundation has become something of a misnomer through the years.

It has extended far beyond its roots as the steward of the Linux kernel, emerging as a sprawling umbrella outfit for a thousand open source projects spanning cloud infrastructure, security, digital wallets, enterprise search, fintech, maps, and more.

The Open Source Initiative (OSI), stewards of the “open source definition,” used this framework in its own open source AI definition.“Most models lack the necessary components for full understanding, auditing, and reproducibility, and some model producers use restrictive licenses whilst claiming that their models are ‘open source,’” the MOF paper authors wrote at the time.