It’s useful that the latest AI can ‘think’, but we need to know its reasoning | John Naughton

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "It’s useful that the latest AI can ‘think’, but we need to know its reasoning | John Naughton" has 1026 words across 46 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "It’s useful that the latest AI can ‘think’, but we need to know its reasoning | John Naughton" was covered 10 hours ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 5 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 12 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22760661</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/its-useful-that-the-latest-17275359554244</li></ul>

The Guardian 10h ago

It’s useful that the latest AI can ‘think’, but we need to know its reasoning | John Naughton - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

OpenAI o1, AKA Strawberry, appears to be a significant advance, but its chain of thought’ should be made public knowledgeIt’s nearly two years since OpenAI released ChatGPT on an unsuspecting world, and the world, closely followed by the stock market, lost its mind.

Within academia, for example, humanities professors agonised about how they would henceforth be able to grade essays if students were using ChatGPT or similar technology to help write them.

The answer, of course, is to come up with better ways of grading, because students will use these tools for the simple reason that it would be idiotic not to – just as it would be daft to do budgeting without spreadsheets.