Here's why SC refused to review pleas against same-sex marriage ruling

Quick Summary:

The majority judgment underscored that decisions regarding the legal status of same-sex marriages fell within the purview of Parliament and not the judiciary.

The Bench comprised Justices BR Gavai, Surya Kant, BV Nagarathna, PS Narasimha, and Dipankar Datta, according to Bar and Bench.“We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record.

However, the entire Bench agreed that the Special Marriage Act, 1954, could not be amended to accommodate same-sex unions.

---

More Pictures

---

Read Quick SummarySave Time

or

Article Details

Category: BusinessFinance

Markets: India

Topics: SC judgment Legal recognition of marriages SC 2023 ruling Indian judiciary Special Marriage Act LGBTQIA+ Review petitions Same-sex marriage Supreme Court Civil unions

Source Website Secure: Yes (HTTPS)

News Sentiment: Neutral

Fact Checked: Legitimate

Article Type: News Report

Published On: 2025-01-10 @ 10:24:03 (11 hours ago)

News Timezone: GMT +5:00

News Source URL: business-standard.com

Language: English

Article Length: 431 words

Reading Time: 3 minutes read

Sentences: 23 lines

Sentence Length: 19 words per sentence (average)

Platforms: Desktop Web, Mobile Web, iOS App, Android App

Copyright Owner: © Business Standard

News ID: 25026847

View Article Analysis

About Business Standard

Main Topics: BusinessFinance

Official Website: business-standard.com

Update Frequency: 275 posts per day

Year Established: 1975

Headquarters: India

News Last Updated: 2 hours ago

Coverage Areas: India

Ownership: Independent Company

Publication Timezone: GMT +5:00

Content Availability: Worldwide

News Language: English

RSS Feed: Available (XML)

API Access: Available (JSON, REST)

Website Security: Secure (HTTPS)

Publisher ID: #49

Publisher Details

Frequently Asked Questions