Government Test Finds That AI Wildly Underperforms Compared to Human Employees

Quick Summary:

Sums It Up Generative AI is absolutely terrible at summarizing information compared to humans, according to the findings of a trial for the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, spotted by Crikey.

Strike one: the AI model was flat-out incapable of providing the page numbers of where it got its information.

Beyond that, the AI summaries tended to include irrelevant and redundant information and were generally "waffly" and "wordy".

---

More Pictures

---

Read Quick SummarySave Time

or

Article Details

Author / Journalist: Frank Landymore

Category: Technology

Markets: United StatesAustralia

Topics: Generative ai Ai chatbots The digest Artificial Intelligence

Source Website Secure: Yes (HTTPS)

News Sentiment: Neutral

Fact Checked: Legitimate

Article Type: News Report

Published On: 2024-09-03 @ 23:30:39 (14 hours ago)

News Timezone: GMT +8:00

News Source URL: futurism.com

Language: English

Article Length: 501 words

Reading Time: 3 minutes read

Sentences: 21 lines

Sentence Length: 24 words per sentence (average)

Platforms: Desktop Web, Mobile Web, iOS App, Android App

Copyright Owner: © Futurism

News ID: 22361270

View Article Analysis

About Futurism

Main Topics: Technology

Official Website: futurism.com

Update Frequency: 10 posts per day

Year Established: 1997

Headquarters: United States

News Last Updated: 15 hours ago

Coverage Areas: United States

Ownership: Independent Company

Publication Timezone: GMT +8:00

Content Availability: Worldwide

News Language: English

RSS Feed: Available (XML)

API Access: Available (JSON, REST)

Website Security: Secure (HTTPS)

Publisher ID: #68

Publisher Details

Frequently Asked Questions