Google can’t defend shady Chrome data hoarding as “browser agnostic,” court says

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Google can’t defend shady Chrome data hoarding as “browser agnostic,” court says" has 142 words across 27 sentences, which will take approximately 1 - 2 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Google can’t defend shady Chrome data hoarding as “browser agnostic,” court says" was covered 10 hours ago by Ars Technica, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Ars Technica' news outlet?

Ars Technica is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1998 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 9 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 11 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22198116</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/google-cant-defend-shady-chrome-17242674428182</li></ul>

Ars Technica 10h ago

Google can’t defend shady Chrome data hoarding as “browser agnostic,” court says - Ars Technica

Quick Summary:

Court reverses Google win in case from Chrome users who chose not to sync data.

The district court failed to consider conflicts with Google's Chrome Privacy Notice (CPN), which said that users' "choice not to sync Chrome with their Google accounts meant that certain personal information would not be collected and used by Google," the appeals court ruled.

On Tuesday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the prior court's finding that Google had properly gained consent for the contested data collection.