Gemini’s data-analyzing abilities aren’t as good as Google claims

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Gemini’s data-analyzing abilities aren’t as good as Google claims" has 2101 words across 70 sentences, which will take approximately 9 - 18 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Gemini’s data-analyzing abilities aren’t as good as Google claims" was covered 2 days ago by TechCrunch, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'TechCrunch' news outlet?

TechCrunch is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 12 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 9 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #21418488</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/geminis-data-analyzing-abilities-arent-17197021951</li></ul>

TechCrunch 2d ago

Gemini’s data-analyzing abilities aren’t as good as Google claims - TechCrunch

Quick Summary:

VP of research at Google DeepMind Oriol Vinyals, who led the briefing, described the model as “magical.“[1.5 Pro] performs these sorts of reasoning tasks across every single page, every single word,” he said.

The second of the two studies, co-authored by researchers at UC Santa Barbara, tested the ability of Gemini 1.5 Flash (but not 1.5 Pro) to “reason over” videos — that is, search through and answer questions about the content in them.

Given a statement like “By using her skills as an Apoth, Nusis is able to reverse engineer the type of portal opened by the reagents key found in Rona’s wooden chest,” Gemini 1.5 Pro and 1.5 Flash — having ingested the relevant book — had to say whether the statement was true or false and explain their reasoning.