FAA will not require urgent 737 MAX engine action after bird strikes

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "FAA will not require urgent 737 MAX engine action after bird strikes" has 538 words across 15 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 5 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "FAA will not require urgent 737 MAX engine action after bird strikes" was covered 5 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 278 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23902565</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/faa-will-not-require-urgent-17326908289445</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 5h ago

FAA will not require urgent 737 MAX engine action after bird strikes - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

Boeing in February published a bulletin to inform flight crews of potential flight deck and cabin effects associated with severe engine damage.

The other incident occurred in a Southwest March 2023 flight that had departed Havana and in which a bird strike led to smoke filling the passenger cabin.

The FAA Corrective Action Review Board reviewed the CFM LEAP-1B engine bird strikes which led to smoke entering two Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.