Experts don’t think AI is ready to be a ‘co-scientist’

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Experts don’t think AI is ready to be a ‘co-scientist’" has 1251 words across 31 sentences, which will take approximately 6 - 11 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Experts don’t think AI is ready to be a ‘co-scientist’" was covered 1 days ago by TechCrunch, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'TechCrunch' news outlet?

TechCrunch is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 10 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26679796</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/experts-dont-think-ai-is-17411815538210</li></ul>

TechCrunch 1d ago

Experts don’t think AI is ready to be a ‘co-scientist’ - TechCrunch

Quick Summary:

Last month, Google announced the “AI co-scientist,” an AI the company said was designed to aid scientists in creating hypotheses and research plans.

Lana Sinapayen, an AI researcher at Sony Computer Science Laboratories in Japan, believes that tools such as Google’s AI co-scientist focus on the wrong kind of scientific legwork.

In an essay earlier this year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said that “superintelligent” AI tools could “massively accelerate scientific discovery and innovation.” Similarly, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has boldly predicted that AI could help formulate cures for most cancers.