Elon Musk owning OpenAI would be a terrible idea. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen | Chris Stokel-Walker

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Elon Musk owning OpenAI would be a terrible idea. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen | Chris Stokel-Walker" has 926 words across 35 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 8 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Elon Musk owning OpenAI would be a terrible idea. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen | Chris Stokel-Walker" was covered 12 hours ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 5 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26100013</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/elon-musk-owning-openai-would-17393475563131</li></ul>

The Guardian 12h ago

Elon Musk owning OpenAI would be a terrible idea. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen | Chris Stokel-Walker - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

The two had a blowout argument over the future direction of OpenAI – the company they came together to found in 2015 – with Altman seemingly content to pursue a for-profit approach and Musk feeling that was forswearing the founding principles of the firm as well as its name.

My head fears Trump might like an ally controlling the key AI companyElon Musk and Sam Altman aren’t exactly the best of friends.

OpenAI couldn’t be open, he reckoned, if it was closed off and trying to make money rather than better humanity.