Collaborative research on AI safety is vital | Letters

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Collaborative research on AI safety is vital | Letters" has 408 words across 14 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 4 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Collaborative research on AI safety is vital | Letters" was covered 5 days ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 4 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #25157593</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/collaborative-research-on-ai-safety-17368725296035</li></ul>

The Guardian 5d ago

Collaborative research on AI safety is vital | Letters - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

If we are to take seriously the risk facing humanity, regulators need the power to recall’ deployed models, as well as assess leading, not lagging, indicators of risk, writes Prof John McDermidRe Geoffrey Hinton’s concerns about the perils of artificial intelligence (Godfather of AI’ shortens odds of the technology wiping out humanity over next 30 years, 27 December), I believe these concerns can best be mitigated through collaborative research on AI safety, with a role for regulators at the table.

Currently, frontier AI is tested post-development using "red teams” who try their best to elicit a negative outcome.

This approach will never be enough; AI needs to be designed for safety and evaluation – something that can be done by drawing on expertise and experience in well-established safety-related industries.Continue reading...