ChatGPT and Google won battle for best tech Super Bowl ads — and Meta lost

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "ChatGPT and Google won battle for best tech Super Bowl ads — and Meta lost" has 1029 words across 47 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "ChatGPT and Google won battle for best tech Super Bowl ads — and Meta lost" was covered 1 days ago by Android Central, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Android Central' news outlet?

Android Central is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 9 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #26049181</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/chatgpt-and-google-won-battle-17392203517886</li></ul>

Android Central Logo Android Central 1d ago

ChatGPT and Google won battle for best tech Super Bowl ads — and Meta lost - Android Central

Quick Summary:

Meta's confusing smart glasses ad traded too heavily on star power and bad humor, while Gemini and ChatGPT focused on AI's potential and heart.

The Super Bowl ad banked too much on star power and not enough on the inherent need people have to learn more about the world around them.

Meta sold one million AI glasses last year and will start selling Oakleys next with the same Meta AI smarts, so this ad seemed like it could jumpstart the journey towards "hundreds of millions" of smart glasses that Mark Zuckerberg wants.