Bill setting term of office of barangay officials is unconstitutional, deceptive and misleading

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Bill setting term of office of barangay officials is unconstitutional, deceptive and misleading" has 662 words across 19 sentences, which will take approximately 3 - 6 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Bill setting term of office of barangay officials is unconstitutional, deceptive and misleading" was covered 4 days ago by Business Mirror, a news publisher based in Philippines.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Mirror' news outlet?

Business Mirror is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2005 that covers mostly business and startups news. The outlet is headquartered in Philippines and publishes an average of 30 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 14 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #25457115</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/bill-setting-term-of-office-17379077843664</li></ul>

Business Mirror Logo Business Mirror 4d ago

Bill setting term of office of barangay officials is unconstitutional, deceptive and misleading - Business Mirror

Quick Summary:

Senate Bill No.2816 "setting the term of office of barangay officials and sangguniang kabataan members for six years” is unconstitutional, deceptive and misleading.

The bill is actually one postponing the BSK elections (BSKE) scheduled on December 1, 2025 to May 8, 2029 without complying with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court in its 2023 decision in Macalintal vs.

And, in the sterling words of Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo in the Macalintal case, “a law changing the schedule of election is a whole different animal (thus) any infringement of the right to vote must be carefully and meticulously scrutinized.