Biden Administration Can Continue To Request Social Media Post Removals, Rules Supreme Court: 'This Work Can Continue As The Country Faces Ongoing Threats'

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Biden Administration Can Continue To Request Social Media Post Removals, Rules Supreme Court: &#039;This Work Can Continue As The Country Faces Ongoing Threats&#039;" has 348 words across 13 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 3 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Biden Administration Can Continue To Request Social Media Post Removals, Rules Supreme Court: &#039;This Work Can Continue As The Country Faces Ongoing Threats&#039;" was covered 5 days ago by Benzinga, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Benzinga' news outlet?

Benzinga is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 2010 that covers mostly technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 30 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #21398408</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/biden-administration-can-continue-to-1719461157720</li></ul>

Benzinga Logo Benzinga 5d ago

Biden Administration Can Continue To Request Social Media Post Removals, Rules Supreme Court: 'This Work Can Continue As The Country Faces Ongoing Threats' - Benzinga

Quick Summary:

What Happened: The Supreme Court justices voted 6-3 to overturn restrictions on the White House and several federal agencies’ interactions with social media platforms, reported Bloomberg on Wednesday.

These restrictions, previously enforced by a federal appeals court, contended that government officials had unconstitutionally pressured platforms into removing posts about the pandemic and the 2020 election.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, representing the high court, stated that the challengers – two states and five residents – lacked legal standing to pursue their lawsuit against the federal government.