Artist appeals copyright denial for prize-winning AI-generated work

Quick Summary:

AI art may create a whole new world of copyright trolling, expert warns.

He claims that the Examiner was biased and considered "improper factors" such as the public backlash when concluding that he had "no control over how the artificial intelligence tool analyzed, interpreted, or responded to these prompts".

Last fall, the Copyright Office refused to register Allen's work, claiming that almost the entire work was AI-generated and insisting that copyright registration requires more human authorship than simply plugging a prompt into Midjourney.

---

More Pictures

---

Read Quick SummarySave Time

or

Article Details

Author / Journalist: Ashley Belanger

Category: Technology

Markets: United States

Topics: Generative ai AI image generators Features Copyright troll Copyright law MidJourney Policy Copyright

Source Website Secure: Yes (HTTPS)

News Sentiment: Negative

Fact Checked: Legitimate

Article Type: News Report

Published On: 2024-10-07 @ 11:00:16 (12 hours ago)

News Timezone: GMT -5:00

News Source URL: arstechnica.com

Language: English

Article Length: 136 words

Reading Time: 1 minutes read

Sentences: 106 lines

Sentence Length: 2 words per sentence (average)

Platforms: Desktop Web, Mobile Web, iOS App, Android App

Copyright Owner: © Ars Technica

News ID: 22922697

View Article Analysis

About Ars Technica

Main Topics: Technology

Official Website: arstechnica.com

Update Frequency: 1 posts per day

Year Established: 1998

Headquarters: United States

News Last Updated: 1 days ago

Coverage Areas: United States

Ownership: Independent Company

Publication Timezone: GMT -5:00

Content Availability: Worldwide

News Language: English

RSS Feed: Available (XML)

API Access: Available (JSON, REST)

Website Security: Secure (HTTPS)

Publisher ID: #32

Publisher Details

Frequently Asked Questions