AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say" has 1002 words across 33 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say" was covered 2 days ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 0 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 1 days ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23547601</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/ai-tool-could-influence-home-17313986173652</li></ul>

The Guardian 2d ago

AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

Campaigners call for end of robo-caseworkers’ amid fears officials will bow to automated enforcement proposals A Home Office artificial intelligence tool which proposes enforcement action against adult and child migrants could make it too easy for officials to rubberstamp automated life-changing decisions, campaigners have said.

As new details of the AI-powered immigration enforcement system emerged, critics called it a "robo-caseworker” that could "encode injustices” because an algorithm is involved in shaping decisions, including returning people to their home countries.Continue reading...

The Home Office refused previous freedom of information inquiries because greater openness “could be used to circumvent immigration controls by providing insight into how work in the Home Office and immigration enforcement is triaged”.