Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.


BEAM Team

6 Dec, 2017

Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial | BEAMSTART News

- From our Sponsors -

A legal dispute involving bitcoin will soon head for trial at the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC), a first for the city-state.

The Straits Times (ST) reported on Tuesday (Dec 5) that the dispute was between electronic market maker B2C2 and bitcoin exchange operator Quoine.

In May, B2C2 had reportedly sued Quoine over trades that the former alleged were wrongfully reversed, resulting in proceeds being deducted.

Related: Build a Business, Not a Financial Machine

The trade proceeds had a value of $3.78 million (S$5 million), which has now potentially ballooned to $30 million, ST reported.

On Tuesday, B2C2 sought to recover 3,084.78582325 bitcoins from Quoine but the case will go to trial as a judge declined to grant summary judgment.

According to ST, B2C2 is accusing Quoine for breach of trust, claiming the latter “acted fraudulently” and “deprived it of the opportunity to sell the proceeds on the date of their highest intermediate value”.

B2C2 says that it had placed orders on Quoine’s platform to sell ethereum for bitcoins at the price of 10 bitcoins for one ethereum. Although the orders were filled and bitcoins were subsequently credited into B2C2’s account, the trades were reversed the next day.

Quoine then argued it was entitled to do so because there was a “huge mark-up over fair global market price”, and that the average market price was way below at about 0.03929075 bitcoin for one ethereum.

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.

Quoine, however, is alleging that B2C2 is “seeking to profit from a technical glitch”.

“It is the defendant’s case that the plaintiff deliberately placed the orders at the abnormal rate in bad faith and for the purpose of manipulating the market,” Quoine was quoted by ST as saying.

Related: Join Entrepreneurs and Investors at Entrepreneurs Retreat 2018  


Article Info:
This article was first published by Jessica Lin on Business Insider Singapore

- From our Sponsors -

Latest Jobs

Product Analyst

Agave

California,

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 125000 yearly

Business Development Rep

Feather

Delhi,

Full Time

USD 1500 — USD 2500 yearly

Software Engineer I/II

Remi

Utah,

Full Time

Salary Undisclosed

Forward Deployed ML Engineer

Triomics

New York,

Full Time

USD 170000 — USD 190000 yearly

Associate Product Manager

Clinikally

Haryana,

Full Time

USD 800000 — USD 1100000 yearly

Founding Account Executive

maintouch

New York,

Full Time

USD 90 — USD 200 yearly

Product Engineer, Applications Operations

Y Combinator

California,

Full Time

USD 185000 — USD 485000 yearly

Software Engineer

Tamarind Bio

California,

Full Time

USD 150000 — USD 250000 yearly

Technical Support Engineer, MX

arketa

Mexico City,

Full Time

USD 45000 — USD 60000 yearly

Sales Development Representative [SDR]

Metriport

California,

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 140000 yearly

BEAMSTART is a hub for everything Startups, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation. Connect with a global community of people, and stay updated with the latest startup jobs, news, and discussions.

 
© 2016 - 2026 BEAMSTART. All Rights Reserved (Legal).