Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.


BEAM Team

6 Dec, 2017

Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial | BEAMSTART News

- From our Sponsors -

A legal dispute involving bitcoin will soon head for trial at the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC), a first for the city-state.

The Straits Times (ST) reported on Tuesday (Dec 5) that the dispute was between electronic market maker B2C2 and bitcoin exchange operator Quoine.

In May, B2C2 had reportedly sued Quoine over trades that the former alleged were wrongfully reversed, resulting in proceeds being deducted.

Related: Build a Business, Not a Financial Machine

The trade proceeds had a value of $3.78 million (S$5 million), which has now potentially ballooned to $30 million, ST reported.

On Tuesday, B2C2 sought to recover 3,084.78582325 bitcoins from Quoine but the case will go to trial as a judge declined to grant summary judgment.

According to ST, B2C2 is accusing Quoine for breach of trust, claiming the latter “acted fraudulently” and “deprived it of the opportunity to sell the proceeds on the date of their highest intermediate value”.

B2C2 says that it had placed orders on Quoine’s platform to sell ethereum for bitcoins at the price of 10 bitcoins for one ethereum. Although the orders were filled and bitcoins were subsequently credited into B2C2’s account, the trades were reversed the next day.

Quoine then argued it was entitled to do so because there was a “huge mark-up over fair global market price”, and that the average market price was way below at about 0.03929075 bitcoin for one ethereum.

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.

Quoine, however, is alleging that B2C2 is “seeking to profit from a technical glitch”.

“It is the defendant’s case that the plaintiff deliberately placed the orders at the abnormal rate in bad faith and for the purpose of manipulating the market,” Quoine was quoted by ST as saying.

Related: Join Entrepreneurs and Investors at Entrepreneurs Retreat 2018  


Article Info:
This article was first published by Jessica Lin on Business Insider Singapore

- From our Sponsors -

Latest Jobs

Backend Developer

Coulomb AI

Karnataka,

Full Time

USD 12000 — USD 25000 yearly

Product + Customer Success

Syntra

California,

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 200000 yearly

Customer Success Engineer

PolicyFly

Full Time

USD 40000 — USD 60000 yearly

Partnerships Lead

Waldium

California,

Contract

USD 60 — USD 70 yearly

Founding Partnerships Manager in SF

Hyperbound

California,

Full Time

USD 240000 — USD 280000 yearly

Forward Deployed MLE

Morph

California,

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 150000 yearly

Ex-founder - Technical, India

Landeed

Telangana,

Full Time

USD 3000000 — USD 6000000 yearly

Forward Deployed Software Engineer

Salient

California,

Full Time

USD 140000 — USD 200000 yearly

Social Media Marketing Intern

Posh

California,

Internship

USD 2000 — USD 3000 yearly

Head of Growth, Checkr Personal

Checkr

California,

Full Time

USD 174000 — USD 205000 yearly

BEAMSTART is a hub for everything Startups, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation. Connect with a global community of people, and stay updated with the latest startup jobs, news, and discussions.

 
© 2016 - 2025 BEAMSTART. All Rights Reserved (Legal).