Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.


BEAM Team

6 Dec, 2017

Singapore is about to get its first bitcoin dispute trial | BEAMSTART News

- From our Sponsors -

A legal dispute involving bitcoin will soon head for trial at the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC), a first for the city-state.

The Straits Times (ST) reported on Tuesday (Dec 5) that the dispute was between electronic market maker B2C2 and bitcoin exchange operator Quoine.

In May, B2C2 had reportedly sued Quoine over trades that the former alleged were wrongfully reversed, resulting in proceeds being deducted.

Related: Build a Business, Not a Financial Machine

The trade proceeds had a value of $3.78 million (S$5 million), which has now potentially ballooned to $30 million, ST reported.

On Tuesday, B2C2 sought to recover 3,084.78582325 bitcoins from Quoine but the case will go to trial as a judge declined to grant summary judgment.

According to ST, B2C2 is accusing Quoine for breach of trust, claiming the latter “acted fraudulently” and “deprived it of the opportunity to sell the proceeds on the date of their highest intermediate value”.

B2C2 says that it had placed orders on Quoine’s platform to sell ethereum for bitcoins at the price of 10 bitcoins for one ethereum. Although the orders were filled and bitcoins were subsequently credited into B2C2’s account, the trades were reversed the next day.

Quoine then argued it was entitled to do so because there was a “huge mark-up over fair global market price”, and that the average market price was way below at about 0.03929075 bitcoin for one ethereum.

As the virtual currency market is currently unregulated in Singapore, B2C2 says there is no legislation which constrains the buying and selling of virtual currencies or their trade prices.

Quoine, however, is alleging that B2C2 is “seeking to profit from a technical glitch”.

“It is the defendant’s case that the plaintiff deliberately placed the orders at the abnormal rate in bad faith and for the purpose of manipulating the market,” Quoine was quoted by ST as saying.

Related: Join Entrepreneurs and Investors at Entrepreneurs Retreat 2018  


Article Info:
This article was first published by Jessica Lin on Business Insider Singapore

- From our Sponsors -

Latest Jobs

Account Executive (Austin, TX - In Office)

Soraban

Texas,

Full Time

USD 60000 — USD 80000 yearly

AI Marketing Strategist

Uplane

California,

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 130000 yearly

Founding Growth and Marketing Lead - AI Product

Dex

California,

Full Time

USD 74000 — USD 110000 yearly

Sales Development Representative

Fresco

California,

Full Time

USD 55000 — USD 120000 yearly

Founding Insurance Producer

Casey

California,

Full Time

USD 120000 — USD 150000 yearly

Founder Associate

QFEX

England,

Full Time

USD 60000 — USD 100000 yearly

Build & DevOps Engineer for Robotics - San Francisco

Polymath Robotics

California,

Full Time

USD 120000 — USD 150000 yearly

Brand Account Manager

Nabis

Full Time

USD 70000 — USD 75000 yearly

Solutions Engineer

Storylane

Full Time

USD 100000 — USD 300000 yearly

Customer Success Manager

Repool

New York,

Full Time

USD 75000 — USD 100000 yearly

BEAMSTART is a hub for everything Startups, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation. Connect with a global community of people, and stay updated with the latest startup jobs, news, and discussions.

 
© 2016 - 2026 BEAMSTART. All Rights Reserved (Legal).