Voters split on whether Harris or Trump would do better on economy: Poll

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Voters split on whether Harris or Trump would do better on economy: Poll" has 993 words across 40 sentences, which will take approximately 5 - 9 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Voters split on whether Harris or Trump would do better on economy: Poll" was covered 1 weeks ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 298 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 3 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22616312</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/voters-split-on-whether-harris-17268101244000</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 1w ago

Voters split on whether Harris or Trump would do better on economy: Poll - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

About 4 in 10 registered voters say Republican Trump would do a better job handling the economy, while a similar number say that about the Democratic vice president, according to a new poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

Going into November's election, neither Kamala Harris nor Donald Trump has a decisive edge with the public on the economy, turning an issue that was once a clear strength for Trump into the equivalent of a political jump ball.

The new poll suggests that Harris may be escaping some of the president's baggage on the issue, undercutting what was previously one of Trump's major advantages.