SC rejects appeal challenging Trai tariff orders, upholds HC decision

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "SC rejects appeal challenging Trai tariff orders, upholds HC decision" has 344 words across 12 sentences, which will take approximately 2 - 3 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "SC rejects appeal challenging Trai tariff orders, upholds HC decision" was covered 5 hours ago by Business Standard, a news publisher based in India.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Business Standard' news outlet?

Business Standard is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1975 that covers mostly business and finance news. The outlet is headquartered in India and publishes an average of 317 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 2 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Negative, indicating that people regard this as "bad news".

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #23948103</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/sc-rejects-appeal-challenging-trai-17328924705456</li></ul>

Business Standard Logo Business Standard 5h ago

SC rejects appeal challenging Trai tariff orders, upholds HC decision - Business Standard

Quick Summary:

The Kerala High Court had refused to entertain the plea of Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation (IBDF) against certain provisions of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulations, 2017 and the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2017 issued by TRAI.

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected an appeal challenging the telecommunication tariff orders of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and affirmed the Kerala High Court verdict that such matters should be dealt by telecom tribunal TDSAT.

The high court had said that IBDF should have approached the TDSAT (Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal) to review the tariff orders.