London Standard’s AI imitation of Brian Sewell proves art critics cannot be easily replaced

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "London Standard’s AI imitation of Brian Sewell proves art critics cannot be easily replaced" has 758 words across 40 sentences, which will take approximately 4 - 7 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "London Standard’s AI imitation of Brian Sewell proves art critics cannot be easily replaced" was covered 21 hours ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 4 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 11 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #22732775</li><li>URL: https://beamstart.com/news/london-standards-ai-imitation-of-17273736794701</li></ul>

The Guardian 21h ago

London Standard’s AI imitation of Brian Sewell proves art critics cannot be easily replaced - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

Nonsensical writing lacks Sewell’s authentic voice and is hateful way for paper to remember one of its best writersWho knew the late art critic Brian Sewell was such a tediously cliched writer?

Especially since some of the dead verbiage in the London Standard’s AI version of Sewell reviewing Van Gogh at the National Gallery has become common currency only since his death at 84 in 2015.

Give him credit, he had a voice.And it was a posh voice.